Skip to main content

Pros and Cons of Blockchain

 

Blockchain is almost always right, and has an incredible number of associated opportunities – from storage, to coding, and far beyond. The most popular and supported example is the Ethereum smart contract, which has revolutionized the coding and cryptocurrency world forever. It showed thousands that crypto isn’t just for payments, but for coders and programmers alike. With so many choices, programmers or cryptocoiners may be wondering – what’s so great about the blockchain? In this article, we have all the information you need so you can make your own decision.

 

Blockchain has many pros – the fact that data can be stored on it is a huge one. A notable example is in the very beginnings of Bitcoin – the genesis block. What’s interesting about this specific block is that it doesn’t reference any other block, because there were not any blocks to reference, and so it has a lot of zero bytes. All blocks have a special section called the coinbase, which is the area that is capable of storing the actual data.

 

Blockchain isn’t only present in Bitcoin, though; Ethereum is another notable example, with smart contracts that can execute any input code for a small fee. This allows for elaborate plans and security check systems to be put in place. The fact that those lines of code cannot be interfered with is also amazing. Coding isn’t the only pro with cryptocurrency, however; the blockchain can also support transfer of funds, which is what most people are familiar with. Funds can be transferred using blocks, which are mined. They also have a set difficulty to control blocktime, and with a low enough difficulty, funds can be transferred almost instantaneously. The blocks also create a ‘confirmation’ system that makes sure double-spends, which are discussed below, don’t occur. This means that the blockchain not only offers permanent storage of code, but also of funds. Nothing like this has ever been created prior to the creation of cryptocurrencies.

 

Now onto the cons: we’ll only cover double-spending here, which is a huge disadvantage. Double spending is the reversal of a transaction to another address, and is a huge factor as to why confirmations are required with most bitcoin-based payment systems. There are lots of double-spends happening, but fortunately, most are very minor and only deal with a few cents. This is still an issue, however, and will likely never disappear completely. Confirmations do help prevent this, but it’s still not a guarantee.

 

With these listed cons and pros, we hope we’ve provided you an accurate view of blockchain. Nothing is perfect, but the system keeps improving and gets better every day.

 

If you liked this article, be sure to share it with friends and family; we’ve got more articles on similar topics, and we guarantee you won’t be disappointed.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is iDice?

iDice is a dice betting Dapp fueled by the use of the Ethereum organize. eg. iDice lets in players do several things and having such an innovative new token on the ETHEREUM Platform, we had to write an article about this new project. Guess on the space by the use of keeping up iDice tokens and best of all 100% of all benefit iDice acquires is dispersed among token holders, related to the amount of tokens they dangle. iDice amusement code is decentralized and changeless. Such gigantic building fees highlight a rising requirement for experienced, fair and cast Dapps. iDice iDice is an control which gives a provably affordable and simple, virtual Ethereum dice betting Dapp. The house edge will be set intensely and token holders have an atypical esteem that is dependably equiva- loaned to the house edge. iDice has a fully simple provide code accessible at etherscan.io. The payout of recreations is many times speedy. Provably Fair iDice uses open provide blockchain...
Post a Comment
Read more

Spanish Banks Form New Blockchain Consortium

A group of Spanish banks has formed the country's first blockchain consortium. Wholesale bank Cecabank announced the effort today, partnering with professional services firm Grant Thornton. Who's involved: In its announcement, Cecabank doesn't say which other institutions are taking part, stating that it "comprises 33% of the Spanish banking sector". However, according to Spanish newspaper El Pais, the group's membership includes Abanca, Bankia, CaixaBank, Kutxabank, Ibercaja, Liberbank and Unicaja. It represents the first major foray into blockchain for these companies, as other Spanish banks, including Banco Santander and BBVA, have been working with the tech for some time. What they're saying: Thus far, only Cecabank has commented publicly on the consortium effort, describing it as a way for its employees to get a top-down understanding of the tech – as well as possible insight into how the bank might actually go about using it. "Employees of all o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ethereum Smart Contract Issues Frustrate Developers with Fatal Bugs

Only weeks after the execution of a hard fork to mitigate various DoS (denial-of-service) attacks, the Ethereum network and its developers are struggling to deal with yet another major flaw. This time, major issues in regards to smart contracts have emerged, which have rendered the efforts of decentralized applications in the Ethereum network purposeless. On November 1, the Ethereum development team and the founder of Solidity warned users and developers against a bug that allowed variables to be overwritten in storage. Variables in a smart contract are agreements made between two or more parties. Thus, if an attacker can gain access to the storage and alters the variables, crucial agreements in decentralized applications can be affected and funds may be extracted, which may pressure developers to discard previous smart contract-based projects to recompile contracts. Ethereum developers including Ansel Lindner stated that the development of an Ethereum application is failing to opera...
Post a Comment
Read more